Thursday, October 18, 2001, 7:11:06 PM, you wrote: SH> On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 at 18:52:41 GMT +0100 (10/19/2001 12:52 AM where SH> you think I live) "John Rainer"=[JR] typed the following :
JR>> We can't use forwarding as the Reply-to address gets screwed and JR>> senders don't always include their email address in the body text. SH> TB 1.54 (still beta) have change the standard header while redirecting SH> a message. Would you mind to try latest beta, perhaps the "new header" SH> will accepted by MIMEsweeper. Unfortunately, the latest beta suffers from the same problem. I have got round it by forwarding (forwarded messages see to get passed ok) the mail with %replyto="%Ofromaddr". This means the staff get a working reply-to address in the mail that ends up in the network. However, the mails they receive still appear in their message list onscreen to come from one address, despite being originally sent by any one of 400 organisations. I tried adding %from="%Ofromaddr" which worked on some mails but some were not sent on by the smtp server accessed by the standalone, so I gave up. At least it works and the original sender address is quoted in the body text. Thanks John Rainer -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
