In a message dated, Sun, 9 Dec 2001 13:35:01 -0700, Rudy Willis [RW]
wrote:
...
>>> You should also activate "Continue processing with other filters",
>>> otherwise your filtering would stop after this filter (which is at
>>> the top of the list :-( ). All your other filters would be rather
>>> useless with this one. ;-)
RW> Doesn't that mean processing for that one message?
Yes.
RW> The next message would start filtering again from the top, right?
Yes.
RW> Like if I move something to another folder and that all I want to
RW> do to that message I don't need that checked, right?
No.
RW> I hope so, or I'm changing a LOT of filters today.
If you're filters are working fine, leave them alone where the option
to continue processing with other filters is concerned. If what your
filters do is to mainly sort messages, then you don't need this
option. If you need more than one filter rule to act on a single
message then you do need the option to continue processing with other
filters.
--
.-.-.
( : ) �Allie C Martin
.-.\ ' /.-. List Moderator and fellow end user
(_.. 'Y' .._) TB! v1.54 Beta/15 & Win2K SP 2
( /|\ ) -
'-' | '-' PGPKey: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=PGPPubKey1
--
________________________________________________________
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
