Hi Dierk,

Yes, it did occur to me to search the archive.

Alex Jason


Tuesday, December 11, 2001, 10:17:09, you wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1

> Hello Alexander!

> On 11 Dec 2001 at 18:41:20 you wrote:

>> I'm new to the list so please forgive me if this has been discussed

> I you always ask for forgiveness, did it ever come to mind that there
> is an archive to search?

>> Is SECURE POP3 possible with TB -- or will it SOON be possible? My mail server has 
>been
>> switched to ATTBI and it requires Secure POP3.

> It was hinted that SSL is planned.

>> How is it that Outlook and many other mail clients have this and we don't . . .

> Because this isn't Outlook? How is it that TB! is safe from malware
> attacks and others aren't?



> - --
> Dierk Haasis
> http://www.Write4U.de
> http://Interest.Write4U.de/pongo

> PGP keys available: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=SendMyPGPkeys

> The Bat 1.54 Beta/14 on Windows 95 4.0 67306684 C

> Sonar no cuesta nada (Tr�umen kostet nichts.).

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: PGP 6.5.8ckt
> Comment: Privacy is the core element to Freedom!

> iQA/AwUBPBY/lvTo1oA8g8dLEQL7pQCeJFxkPJWLYTB6689MS77pdqRc+n8AoKvc
> X+8uBmi2BnXsL+3sEkZo77ns
> =1nHY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
________________________________________________________
Archives   : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Vers: 1.53d
FAQ        : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com 

Reply via email to