-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Luc,
On Friday, December 28 2001 at 07:46 PM PDT, you wrote: > *** PGP Signature Status: good > *** Signer: Luc Knaepkens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Invalid) > *** Signed: 28/12/01 6:46:11 PM > *** Verified: 28/12/01 7:47:15 PM > *** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** > Glad that it's me this time who can do something ;-) Thanks again... it means reading your postings with greater ease. BTW, your signatures in this thread anyway have all been "Good" on my copy of Becky. I remember trying to verify your signatures on TB and always having them come out "Bad", and I can't remember Allie's explanation except that it did involve the on-screen wrapping in TB's FWF Viewer. I don't seem to have that problem here with Becky, yet I was led to understand the viewers act the same. - -- Nick - -=N.J. Andriash | Courtenay, B.C. Canada=- Win 98SE | PGP 7.1 | Becky v2.00.08 ____________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.1 Comment: Join [EMAIL PROTECTED] iQA/AwUBPC09w9rrL7k7yn3SEQIwDQCfXN9wIHTqew+fWdgdJYyRugFq+CcAnjd3 0jjQMmzamnN7M4bTAg4dZvu9 =CSSJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
