Hi Charlie, Regarding your first point, I have no idea as I don't require that feature and have no interest in messing around with what works.
Regarding point two, I had WGM already and had been using it for 18 months or so without broadband or proxy, ie on a standard dialup connection. I am happy with how it works, so again, for me at least, I see no good reason to change to The Bat! server mode. If WGM screws up at any point, then I will investigate changing over. BTW, I mentioned BT Broadband as some of the proxy's I looked at don't like the USB connection that BT use. PPPShar is very happy with it and they give great support too ... they're a tiny Indian company (and PPPShare is a tiny proxy that really illustrates that less is often more). Glad to hear you're up an running anyway. With best wishes, Dave ---------------------------------------------------------------------- David Conroy MSW Personal Life and Business Coaching World-wide Web: www.e-coaching-only.com E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member International Coach Federation, ID 1006660. PGP Key on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_pgp Instant Messaging on request mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=send_im Using The Bat! v1.53d Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 Sunday, February 03, 2002, 9:40:08 AM, Charlie wrote: Charlie (ceejay)> Just wondering how you'd get on if clients on the network have mail Charlie (ceejay)> accounts that do not reside on the Host access providers mail servers? Charlie (ceejay)> Also was there any particular reason why you went with Workgroupmail Charlie (ceejay)> in preference to using TB! in server mode? This message was checked by MailScan for WorkgroupMail. www.workgroupmail.com -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
