It was foretold that on 18-2-2002 @ 02:09:25 GMT+0100 (which was 2:09 where I live) Mrten wrote and spread these wise comments on "The Bat FAQ, "=" Navigation":
M> those are the -very- minor details in HTML that do not really effect the M> rendering in most browsers. the HTML itself has many, many errors (try M> running http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html through M> validator.w3.org) which can effect the rendering more than a doctype does, M> but it seems like it is generated, so correcting by hand seems useless. i bet the validation of the entire page will be invalid: no doctype and no character encoding specified ------> W3 validator will not parse a page (as far as i know and tried). Using this validator (which also uses the W3C standards) http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/ gives indeed many, many errors (of which maybe Marc isn't aware off) Just for your information. For the record: this isn't criticism on Marks excellent effort. -- Best regards, Luc mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] \\\\\|||///// \\\ - - /// ( @ @ ) ----oOOOo---(_)---oOOOo------------------- Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Thought for the day : "Doctor to patient: I have good news and bad news - the good news is that you are not a hypochondriac." ------------------------Ooooo------------- ( ) ooooO ) / ( ) (_/ \ ( \_) -- ________________________________________________________ Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Latest Vers: 1.53d FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
