-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Om 19:58 op vrijdag 26 april 2002, Dierk Haasis:
>> Is not also true that for PGP to be of any use the recipient must have >> PGP installed also? Else they cannot decode/check signature. It is this >> aspect that makes me shy away from PGP > 1. You are right, other than with S/MIME, PGP has to be installed on > both the senders and the recipients computer. What about that lets you > shy away? I don't think that one can verify S/MIME signed messages when one uses elm as a mailer, right? Or am I mistaken? Did you mean it was integrated in Outlook? (and now also in TB..) TB! has PGP-support integrated (albeit not really complete), so in theory Colin should not have to shy away :) Only for the more advanced features of keymanagement a native installation of PGP would be handy... Mrten. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.5.8ckt7 iQA/AwUBPMm000tQMadp+KslEQLNVwCeNYgPnbaXFyve6k36wEU/wOz5QwkAnjXy 4spxLA+84pUWhELA+GoikAw7 =Ngn/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60c FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
