-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 3 May 2002, at 05:51:47 -0500 Michael wrote, or scribbled:
M>> Btw, the term "Microsoft anything-dealing-with-privacy-security" M>> sounds pretty weird, nein? Do you folks really think it is a good idea M>> making Bat involved with a such things? MD> That was the point of one of my earlier messages. You're right. I saw this letter later. MD> The answer is no. :) So, we have already a "folks" having all two members. ;-) MR>>> I still don't know why the two implementations should be MR>>> incompatible, but they are. I can S/MIME sign using either one, MD> They weren't. This is a bug that has been reported. Hm, no, it refers to "normal" S/MIME implementation/standard and MS' a new "local" "standard" they "devised" to make things less usable, as usual, and by this to divide Internet "community" again. So this is not a bag, this is just a mess with standards and "standards". Btw, "MR>>>" refers to Melissa's comment. She explained this standards problem in Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> just fine and clear, and we have no answer yet. Btw2, I see your S/MIME signature as valid here, as usual, so I suppose it is a "normal" standard S/MIME, not MS' CrippleAPI. Mandara - -- (__) If you need this key: ('') <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0x257DFF36> \/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE80n1qvgcu6yV9/zYRApDuAKCxnuCdPmjcFJtcZ+aiulldkdqzkQCgp0ol uLt5FDcH+7pQI1eUK7gKhas= =SlWQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60h FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
