On Sat, 4 May 2002, Michael Disabato wrote: <snip>
> I can confirm this. I've tried reading a message originated from > Outlook and TheBat! 1.60c. The implementations are mutually > incompatible. So much so, that Outlook will not even recognize that > the message from TB! was even signed. The behaviors are consistent > with 1.53d, 1.60c, and 1.60h. > > This leaves the question, do we need to buckle under to MS to get > S/MIME to work? If so, then I'll resume using PGP. Also, how old is > this "new local standard"? > > Regards, > > Mike > I couldn't give a date... but I'd not buckle under it. It's microsoft using their position again I believe. I'm going to get mutt working on here, I think that supports s/mime signs, and I'll check out TB!. Fortunately most products on unix/linux are all RFC compliant... unlike 90% of MS products ;) If they were compliant, we'd not need to have two different options in TB! to read the signatures. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
