-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Reclutamiento [R] wrote: ... R> Although Bat does not filter messages at the server nor at the R> entrance gate, it turns out that using Dispatch mail on Sever R> comand is far more efficient than using the www.spamkiller.com .
Is it? Don't you have to be present to use the dispatcher to look for the spam and then delete them? With Spamcop, it will delete the spam unattended. What do you mean by efficient there? - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60j | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE81uDUV8nrYCsHF+IRAjkaAJ9/DdRoFfPFixbtaxHf+M1ikUyMRQCgoBsq DPSLuN4/D4VtasuX3oK2yCY= =9Oc0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60i FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
