On Wednesday, May 22, 2002, Gerard wrote... > ON Wednesday, May 22, 2002, 10:52:49 PM, you wrote:
JA>> Why do you say that? Are the people in the CC also not recipients JA>> of the email? > It depend on your interpretation. The CC's receive the mail but it > is not directed at them specificly. I would like a "CC" option next > to "recipient" in the filters because it's a separate header. I see what you mean... have an independent rule for To: and CC:. I guess that might be something you can send as a suggestion. JA>> As for the BCC not matching, it shouldn't. The servers/mail JA>> client don't add a recipient tag (like To/CC), but it has a JA>> Received: .... For <bcc'd address> line in the headers. > That's what I expected. 1 out of 2 right. Good... hehe... that's what you get ;) Unless the mail client is messed up. I've seen some mails come with a BCC: field ;) -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
