Dierk [D], On 28-05-2002 18:12, you wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> Yes. That would be sufficient - except then it's not an "importer".
D>>> But??? >> What do you mean (sometimes you can trim _too_ much :) )? D> After your explanation you wrote (see above) "it's not an 'importer'" D> and I asked for the complete sentence "but it is an ...". Arh, OK. D> To explain further: It may be a broken importer (which I doubt, D> following Marck's reasoning) but it is still an importer. Or what D> would you call it? You are right. It's still an importer - but a bad one IMO. -- <greeting> Best regards </greeting> <author> Peter Fjelsten </author> <thebat version> 1.60k </thebat version> <os> Windows XP 5.1.2600 </os> ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
