Allie,
It sounds like you've chosen the BAV plug-in for NOD32 over Eset's POP
scanner. Why?
When I tried it out, I chose to stay with NOD32's own scanner, partly
because of speed and partly because an AV plug-in didn't seem like a
good place to test a Beta. I also remember something about one being
able to scan a target that the other could not, but do not recall the
specifics on that. I'd be interested to hear how you came to your
conclusion to go with the BAV plug-in.
--
JN
On Tuesday, June 04, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
[...]
> ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/bav/Nod32.BAV
> It works well, I've come to realize. It's just that when it's doing
> its stuff the NOD32 window flickers for an instant into view.
> With the eicar test virus, I see that it nicely strips attachments and
> and will create a quarantine folder for infected messages. Nice.
> Better than using the system monitor for mail in my estimation since
> it will do more for you.
[...]
________________________________________________________
Current Ver: 1.60m
FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
