-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph N. [JN] wrote: ... JN> When I tried it out, I chose to stay with NOD32's own scanner, JN> partly because of speed and partly because an AV plug-in didn't JN> seem like a good place to test a Beta. I also remember something JN> about one being able to scan a target that the other could not, JN> but do not recall the specifics on that. I'd be interested to hear JN> how you came to your conclusion to go with the BAV plug-in.
It will create a quarantine folder right there in the TB folder list from which I can more easily work with the supposedly infected message. It will also strip infected attachments from messages. I'd prefer if it put the infected attachment in a quarantine folder rather than send it in oblivion so I go for the quarantine approach so that I can inspect for false positives. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60p | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE8/Sh9V8nrYCsHF+IRAklNAKDldpYce/0GfeqlOuaOtPtG6k2OlwCg3RaG OMSvx9mUQwO4TpGPeRB6LWk= =6KMl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60m FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://bt.ritlabs.com
