Hi Dierk, On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 07:48:29 +0200, you wrote: > This picks up a comment by Nick Andriash from another thread: > > > Been there... done that... and it's not going to happen because NAI would > > never release what RITLabs required in order to write the Plugin. My > > suggestion would be to go with PGP 6.5.8ckt as it not only has a current > > Plugin for TB, but it has more features than PGP 7.0.3/4 including PGPDisk. > > To clear that further - and bring it out of conversational limbo > land -, a few days ago, it seems, NAI (McAfee) announced to not > follow development of PGP "because it does not pay off". > Nonetheless, the code won't be published, was an additional comment > by them. > > The most advanced (and always endorsed by me) version will be Imad > Faiad's 6.5.8ckt with his own TB! plug-in.
Thanks for the info... I may look into downgrading if it is worth integrating in the pgp signing etc. I had noticed on the PGP International site [www.pgpi.com] that NAI had released an SDK for PGP, but when I attempted to download, all the links were broken. As for NAI saying it's not profitable, aren't they using it within their McAffe E-Business servers, and firewalls? It sounds very typical to me of a large corporation pulling off a small company, taking their ideas, bleeding them dry, then kicking them out. But that is my opinion ;) Thanks for the info anyway, I'll look into downgrading if it is worth it... I'm assuming PGP6.5.8 can still read the PGP7 key files? -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.60q FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
