Dear Adam, Sunday, July 28, 2002, 5:13:14 PM, you wrote:
SU>> Only one question: Is spam prohibited by law? :-). SU>> Until not - all measures like filtering by ISP are illegal :-). AR> Wrong AR> ANy ISP's mail servers (indeed any mail server) is the property of an AR> organisation and they are well within their rights to accept or deny any AR> traffic as they see fit. AR> If they want to use SPEWS or any other filter list then its up to them - its AR> their property and their bandwidth they are using. SU>> Only thing is legal - filtering on receiver side- it is your mail and SU>> you can do with it what you want. AR> Wrong AR> Look through your ISP's AUP and there will be quite stringent restrictions on AR> what you can do with mail OK. I know it. But there is one problem. Just imagine - mail office - Friday - person see a lot of mail to deliver and decide - i am tired - and he throw all mail to the trashcan :-). You lose important mail just because person who send it use "suspicious" e-mail client (or something else, Big Brother is watching you ):-). Next Step of spammers will be setting as X-Sender newest version of OE Express :-). What ISP will do with it? Filtering by X-Sender is a dead way. And who will be loosers in this battle - I know - TB! users :-) SU>> P.S. As i know - you can not skip ads at the beginning of DVD film. SU>> Or I am wrong. AR> Wrong AR> Skipping ads at the beginning of a DVD is a technical issue. But it is spam :-). I bought film, not ads :-). Other words - spamming is just technical issue too :-). -- Best regards, Sergey Uvarov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TheBat version :1.62/Beta1, Running at NT 5.0, Build 2195 Service Pack 2. ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
