Hello Jan, Sunday, July 28, 2002, 7:59:45 AM, you wrote:
JR> Of course not. They should just make it known that they JR> don't approve. Simple as that. Well I haven't read re-vised TB license, but according to Marck's mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] the license has been revised. Quote: AR>>> (David Harris's announcement of revised licensing terms for AR>>> Pegasus Mail prohibiting its use or promotion as spamware) and AR>>> advised him to do likewise. T>> This is quote a good idea. MDP> Already done. Read the TB licence. The original message in this thread seems to lend itself to the promotional issue. I'm not a lawyer, but I would think you need to own TB to be in violation of the license. So if the promoter doesn't own TB, I'd say no problem with license violation. Just a thought. -- Best regards, Greg Strong TB! v1.62/Beta1 on Windows 98 PGP public keys: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=0xB1FE63FA&Body=Please20send20keys ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
