-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dwight A Corrin [DAC] wrote:
DAC> To me, this statement makes it sound like it requires a lot. It DAC> didn't seem like much work to me. Just have to tick a box which DAC> says make a rule, then say yes or no, a few times. When I was DAC> running Norton Firewall some time back, it was more intrusive and DAC> more demanding. Well, IMO, there's more to configuring Kerio Personal Firewall than merely giving applications permission as you do when the popups appear. If you really want it to be effective then it's best to properly tune the rules. Sometimes the suggested permissions that appear with each popup are too narrow resulting in further permission requests for the same application or the permission that appear are too generous. DAC> I'm not disagreeing with your statement, just suggesting readers DAC> of it shouldn't be put off by the notion it's too much bother. I wouldn't recommend using it in a 'not really knowing what's happening' sort of a fashion at all. BID, for example, is *much* easier to use. - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.61 | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.91 (Win32) iD8DBQE9RahUV8nrYCsHF+IRAnMGAKCbO+fgDpnRidEzZe0uowTm8BP6fACfdbWp jgmq+NDGVBm9KvNG1iffTno= =hAcU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
