Hi ETM, On Sat, 03 Aug 2002, at 22:54:01 [GMT -0400] (03:54 where I live) you wrote:
E> I generally read in real time (probably means I should get a E> real life <grin>) and so I usually remember the thread. E> Elaine E> Hello Adam E> On Saturday, August 3, 2002, you wrote >> Reading a top posted email is like trying to have an argument with a >> clairvoyant...... E> ________________________________________________________ E> Current Ver: 1.61 E> FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com E> Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] E> Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com E> Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] E> TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] E> Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/ No offense Elaine but that post shows the problem with top posting I saw someone else use this A: Because it doesn't make sense when reading long threads. Q: Why is it wrong to top post? -- 04 August 2002, 03:56 [ Adam Rykala : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] [ [new-wales] project : http://www.new-wales.net ] [ Public key : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] I love the "swooshing" sound deadlines make as they go by. All messages both into and out of this account have been scanned with AntiVir's Antivirus Mail Gateway for Linux. However, all attachments should be scanned also with a virus checker at the receiver's end to ensure that the files are clean and free of virus infection. All messages are for the attention of the recipient only. ________________________________________________________ Current Ver: 1.61 FAQ : http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TBTech List: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bug Reports: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
