-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Luc [L] wrote:
L> Well, that's the first time i get that suggestion. Any one else
L> having problems with it on the list? I'm happy to oblige.
<chuckle> It doesn't really matter either way to me.
What does get my attention is your amazingly long introductory
statement. It's like a paragraph. Me thinks that's going a tad
overboard, especially in the interest of our recurring theme of
avoiding unnecessary bandwidth wastage. Not to mention poor Miguel
having to wade through it to find the real reply text. I'm here
shaking my head in awesome wonder. ;) But that's just me. I'm not
making any moderatorial declarations. There are restrictions on overly
long signatures, i.e., the 4-6 line limit. I guess there must be some
discretion exercised with the excessive salutations with every message
to the list. I do agree that it can be entertaining with private
messages.
- --
Cheers, | List Moderator
Allie C Martin | TB! v1.62/Beta1 | Windows XP Pro
____________..____________:________________..________________
PGP/GPG Key: http://pubkey.ac-martin.com
'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQE9VTbbV8nrYCsHF+IRAhM7AKCWtq/hXG5Wk4dH84BQpxk2xhMc2ACeIWbn
WcgPWey13uw4WOHvGd/43PU=
=kPwh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
________________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
