Hello Thomas, Monday, August 12, 2002, 8:06:52 AM, Thomas F. wrote:
> 1.) I *don't* see a reason why it is *not* re-sizeable. > Rephrasing this without using a double negative makes it: "It should > be re-sizeable". I have seen, also from St.Music's replies, that this > double-negative was understood to say the opposite from what I meant. > I will avoid double-negatives in the future. Be careful with double negative, for me as a viennese it can mean something double bad, and not make it okay ... -- Best regards, Clemens written with TheBat! 1.61 on Windows XP, 5 1 Build 2600 on Tuesday, August 13, 2002 at 12:14:38 AM ________________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
