-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas,
@27-Aug-2002, 22:41 +0700 (16:41 UK time) Thomas F. [TF] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: MDP>> We've queried the MailMan discussion group about this... TF> Ahem; not my business. But are we fixed on MailMan? Sorry if my TF> question is out of bounds. AFAIK yes, because that's what Johannes uses on his servers. I'm perfectly happy with mailman. We've lost nothing in comparison with Listar and gained much. The "loss" in this instance is not a loss but a flaw in one of the gains. Plaintext digests do not suffer the loss of Reply-To - only MIME digests - which we've never had before. "Swings and roundabouts" I'd say. - -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v1.61 on Windows 2000 5.0.2195 Service Pack 2 ' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.1.91-nr1 (Windows 2000) iD8DBQE9a6ywOeQkq5KdzaARAm7vAKCWd/+sTXrHnbeTv0x7yh6fGP8ADgCggCue Gzthso2MF5VYybPxEZkMzIg= =l2bd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
