Hi Gerard, On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 21:41:31 +0200, you wrote: > SP> If this were the case, imagine the kind of abuse email in general > SP> would be subjected to. > > It isn't really a way to bulk email, you have to receive it yourself > first before you can redirect it anyway. It is just that I want to be > able to forward email without people knowing that I was in between.
An impossibility unless you can inject your mail back into the original senders mail server, and it follow over the same router to the final destination. Which I'd guess would take a fair bit of work. Each mail server tags on it's own details about how it received it, so even if TB! were not to set/update the In-Reply-To and Reference header, they'd easily be able to tell it didn't come from the original sender based on received headers anyway. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
