On Tuesday, September 24, 2002, 8:31 AM, you wrote:
LG> On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 at 13:27:31 [GMT +0200], you wrote: G>> I suggested Postcast because I use it and its free. LG> I've been using Postcast as well for the TBLH discussion list, but LG> I've noticed it's a little on the slow side. Have you noticed that as LG> well? I'm wondering if it's a configuration issue. It shouldn't be too LG> slow as it's going 128Kbps on a Cable connection. LG> Cheers, LG> Leif Gregory Hi, I also tried Postcast, but I got tired of waiting for my PC to finish booting. Seems the postcast service took FOREVER to startup or connect, or whatever it does.I still have it installed, but I don't run it anymore, I'm back to using my ISPs SMTP server. Maybe Allie could give us a quick primer on Mercury32 ;) I took a look at it before I installed postcast, but it scared me away, Postcast was a snap to install. oh yeah, I have a 1.6Ghz PC with 256 megs of ram, so speed of processor shouldn't be an issue. -- Paul Using The Bat! v1.62/Beta5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
