On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 07:10:48 -0500 Scott McNay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Option only seems to be there if you have messages sorted by >>> thread. >> Which shouldn't matter, as the OP asks: " ... mark an individual >> thread as read?" which implies a threaded (by references, subject, >> whatever) sort :-). > A thread is a thread. This message is part of a thread, whether I have > it showing that way or not. No. ... *ooppss* ... Sorry. I ment to say: Define thread. Define it _objective_, not only "I think a thread is ...", define _all_ criteria that lead to 'a message belonging to a thread'. Now take these criteria you defined and do a virual 'select whole thread (which this message belongs to)' for every one. Now tell me the difficulties when having in mind there are four possibilities to visualize threads in TB! with 'select thread' ... And see why it's safer the option ain't present when 'threading' is set to 'None'. -- Pit ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
