-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

'Lo Chris,

On Saturday, October 19, 2002, 1:53:34 AM, you authored this:

CW> I  believe  you  can, as I was for a while, but it was a bit of overkill
CW> with  potential  conflicts,  which  isn't  nice as I experienced earlier
CW> today! :-( Killed my PC until I managed to restart (removing the battery
CW> from  my  laptop)  into  safe  mode.  Then did a system restore, removed
CW> unwanted  virus scanners and now running like a dream again. DrWeb seems
CW> very  nice  and  also checks compressed files before execution, which is
CW> currently being discussed, but something I was personally looking for.

I've  never had conflicts on my system with multiple scanners, and that part
isn't  really  a  worry  to  me. I was just trying to figure out whether TB!
would/would  attempt  to  run  all  plugins  in the list simultaneously, and
therefore  find  out  whether  all scanners vie for priority, or whether TB!
gives priority to the topmost plugin and ignores or queues the rest.

CW> All I see is that I've a plug-in but it doesn't say what program.

It  could  be  then that the Kapersky plugin is just verbose and the AVG one
isn't :)

Sl�n,

 Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk

_______________________________________
Faffing about with TB! v1.61 on W2K SP3

PGP Key: http://pgp.netbanger.com/index.shtml

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your privacy with PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966
Comment: Fingerprint: 851C F927 0296 FF1C 70A2  474F CB6E 6FFE 5C7E 8966

iQA/AwUBPbE+x8tub/5cfolmEQK3hgCbBGuYM8ZP9A0g7Ji2g1yBnT6uJBMAoKM4
6OSBT/ukH6jvRB4m7pMD0WLb
=f+Xi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to