Hi Simon, On Saturday, October 19, 2002 12:04 your local time, (16:49 my local time), you wrote:
> If you don't run real-time virus scanning tasks in the background/as > services, which I don't because of the performance overhead and > because it is mostly overkill, then having multiple scanners is > pretty straight forward: Yes. I missed this point. I don't use real-time scanning either, but never considered having multiple scanners. This is probably because of my own threat assessment. -- be well, Sudip Pokhrel | /"\ PM: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185 | X Against HTML E-mail ! http://pgpkeys.mit.edu | / \ ___________________________________________________________________ Hollywood's Law #24: You're very likely to survive any battle in any war unless you make the mistake of showing someone a picture of your sweetheart back home ___________________ TB! v1.61 on XP Pro| P4-1.6Ghz 256MB RAM| ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
