-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, October 28, 2002, Joseph N. wrote...
> This is not intended to start a discussion of HTML. It is not about > HTML, nor big bandwidth mailings, nor UCE. It is about simple > formatting conventions which go beyond plain text but stop well short > of what many of us dislike about HTML email. > What, either in terms of technical issues or design philosophy, would > prevent TB! from allowing bullets, italics, underlines, and bold? In > other words, why not go a little bit toward more functionality and > more complex communications, while still staying well away from the > problems of HTML? Would you mean like the enchanced-text/rich text mode? I guess there is nothing stopping RitLabs from creating such a feature, it'd probably require a little work into RTF, but they aren't that difficult. Plus there are a number of mail readers that support it to. I'd be semi-interested to see if they'd implement it, as I might use it at work sometimes for code exchange and such, but not much for personal use. There has been rumours that HTML will be supported in version 2 though, so RTF might just be pointless as HTML is probably supported in a lot more clients than RTF. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPb2TfiuD6BT4/R9zEQJWvACePEaFEeqa60Qpfh1kORGp5ikxTuUAn2Rg 6FsOJbobEX3vpDvZs2tjNh0m =kstc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
