-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In <mid:1128834139.20021109113824@;comcast.net>,
Perry Nelson [PN] wrote:'

ACM>> I'm wondering then, why quote these sites at all since I doubt
ACM>> the skepticism would have been there about the quality of the
ACM>> tests if AVG had passed most of them rather than failed most
ACM>> of them.

PN> I don't use either of these AV programs, so I really don't have
PN> a dog in this fight.

My comment wasn't directed at you specifically. It's just the line
of argument that provoked me to share that feeling.

I'm just wondering what the comments would have been if AVG was
posted as being great since it won most of the VB100% awards.

Just playing devils advocate really. :)

- -- 
Allie C Martin     \      TB! v1.62/Beta7 & WinXP Pro (SP1)
 List Moderator    /   PGP Key - http://pub-key.ac-martin.com
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (Win32) - GPGshell v2.65

iD8DBQE9zTyuV8nrYCsHF+IRAmuZAJ9eHGg3EVEqeEsusxUGMtiICGxDIQCgge72
uz3T40xpd/vcE9S+Bq+qWG4=
=MLwL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to