Hello Anne,

On or about Sunday, November 10, 2002, 12:49:14 PM, in a galaxy
far, far away, Anne wrote:


A> Ermmmm that's OK insofar as TB! and e-mail goes Spike, but to say that
A> an AV is unnecessary because one runs TB! is overlooking the fact that
A> virus can be introduced to a system in other ways as well - e.g. via
A> floppy disks, CD-Rom etc, and via downloaded software - so unless you
A> don't introduce any other software to your system it's always at risk
A> of infection - even with the security settings in the browser set to
A> optimum.

I have a separate "condom equipped" junk system that I test the
rare odd floppy or CD on if necessary.  It has NO MODEM, NO HDD,
boots with a floppy, and uses a NAV rescue disk (borrowed from a
paranoid friend).  In the rare instance where I purchase software
online from a less than mainstream vendor, I do the same, using a
ZIP drive in the same machine.  I actually use it only 3-5 times
a YEAR out of necessity.  I do use this system to experiment with
virus material I receive, but with my ISP condomizing my mail
now, I have to use a stand-alone account to receive anything to
experiment with.  I then install a junk HDD and let the bugger
rip!  Surprisingly little if any real damage occurs anyway.

In other words yes, I have this down to a science.  I should, as
I have been building my own machines since the first PC/XT
clones. I've only purchased one "brand name" computer in my life,
and it was a total unmitigated disaster. Proprietary EVERYTHING,
and 300-400% higher to upgrade than generic.  $195 for a $35
power supply when needed, floppy drives with backwards
(non-standard) connections..........

I'll be the first to admit that I'm an unusually well informed
user, but it doesn't take rocket science to protect yourself from
the dearth of XXX.jpg.pif/scr or similar foolishness out there.
The security fixes for the browser are easy for anyone who can
read a list and check/uncheck a click-box.  The specs are
published on most any security site.

Before I deviate totally afield (into total O/T territory) let me
finish by saying that a _well-informed_ TB! user has no need for
e-mail scanning.  IMHO it is a needless drag on resources.  I'll
have no more to say on this issue, as I have no desire to be glue
factory material.

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

--------------------------------------------------
Get a PERMANENT 100MB capacity mailbox for ONLY
$29.95/year.  No more lost mail due to mailbox
capacity restrictions.  Access by POP3 or Webmail!
Earn a FREE mailbox with their referral program.
(HINT - You get $11.00 towards your mailbox for 
each referral who signs up!)
Apply NOW at http://1110.runbox.com
--------------------------------------------------
Running The Bat! V1.60h on Windows 2000 Vers. 5 0
Build 2195 Service Pack 3


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to