Hello Mitch,

Thursday, November 14, 2002, 12:50:23 AM, you wrote:

MW> Barry2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Tuesday, November 12, 2002, 6:47:18 PM

>> Hello Mitch,

>> Tuesday, November 12, 2002, 3:35:37 AM, you wrote:

MW>>> Barry2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Monday, November 11, 2002, 7:18:49 PM

MW>>> Aren't you concerned about losing legitimate mail in the spam screen?

>> Not at all - all mail headers are looked at before deciding whether to
>> download or not. You soon learn to spot the legitimate mail so that
>> leaves the SPAM, again easy to spot, and the unfamiliar mail which
>> comes in for a closer inspection. If suspicious looking then it either
>> gets deleted or left on the server till we can check it out more
>> thoroughly.

MW> I know from experience that I can't always tell legitimate mail from
MW> spam just by glancing at the headers. Most of the time, yes, but not
MW> all the time.

First of all, apologies for the double posts ... don't know quite how
that happened !!

Just have to be careful I guess ... hasn't been a problem for us here
but I agree it takes time to get used to the system. At first you are
slower at the pre-scan but soon learn to recognise the mail you want
to get. That's also maybe the difference between how we do it and the
way others think about it ... we don't look for the bad mail to block
but rather look for the good mail we want to get, by default - mail we
don't want is SPAM, regardless of content < lol >

-- 
Best regards,
 Barry2
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 98 4.10 Build  2222


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to