-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

'Lo Chiropter Operators,

In  a recent discussion with a friend I was _told_ ;) that 'Re:' used in the
subject  line  of  an  email  was  an  abbreviation  for  'Reply'  and _not_
'Regarding',  and  that  Re:  _shouldn't  ever_  be  used  in  the  sense of
'Regarding'  when  used  in  email  message Subject fields. The reason I was
given was that using 'Regarding', whether in abbreviated form or not, in the
'Subject:'  field,  was  tautological.  Although I can see the logic there I
didn't think that was a good enough reason in itself.

Anyhow,  after  thinking about it, I can understand that using Re: in a *new
message* to mean 'Regarding' may be confounding to the recipient of it as it
may be mistaken to mean a 'Reply', but I am still uncertain whether there is
an actual proper or accepted usage of 'Re:' in email messages.

I  looked  up  RFC2822 and from what I can gather the use of Re: is first of
all optional as it states that:

RFC2822>...the field body MAY start with the string "Re: "...

It then goes on to define "Re:" :

RFC2822>...string "Re: " (from the Latin "res", in the matter of)..."

Well  the RFC would then seem to be suggesting the use of "Re:" in the sense
of  'Regarding'. However, The Bat! (and some other clients) seem to be using
'Re:' to mean 'Reply' and not "in the matter of", as my friend is suggesting
is  proper.  In  fact,  in  TB!'s  help  file  the SINGLERE macro is used to
"disable  reply  counting".  So  then,  Re[3] in the subject line would mean
Reply 3 and not Regarding 3, or "in the matter of" 3.

So,  does  anyone know whether there is some email etiquette to settle this.
Does  Re: mean 'Regarding' or 'Reply' when used in the Subject field? And is
one acceptable and the other unacceptable?

- --
Sl�n,

 Simon @ theycallmesimon.co.uk

******************************************
PGP Key: http://pgp.theycallmesimon.co.uk/

Faffing about with TB! v1.61 on W2K SP3

#2754. Raw Rid Less My Quo �

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Privacy is freedom. Protect your privacy with PGP!
Comment: KeyID: 0x5C7E8966
Comment: Fingerprint: 851C F927 0296 FF1C 70A2  474F CB6E 6FFE 5C7E 8966

iQA/AwUBPd2O8Mtub/5cfolmEQL+NgCgqVGuMSPlKlC/6j1O/xG1pP7W2IEAoMX5
i3HO69wvNkXQNwGbPau92hCX
=qoyq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to