-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday, November 28, 2002, Richard Wakeford wrote...
>> Start changing things, or flexing the rules slightly, and you end >> up having all kinds of problems. > Unless you're Microsnort in which case you can design a browser that > doesn't conform to the proper rules Case in point ;) IE is very buggy, and has security holes in it that'd scare a lot of people if they knew about them. Maybe if they considered following the RFCs, rules and standards that were laid out, maybe Windows might be a little more secure (starting with their modified TCP Stack). - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Fingerprint: 676A 1701 665B E343 E393 B8D2 2B83 E814 F8FD 1F73 iQA/AwUBPeb9QCuD6BT4/R9zEQKl3ACgw+RIZu165j9N7JCiIiRh9xx1dFEAnjvO n4JQ1iB3GvwxAO5IpDsKHEDM =cZ4w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
