-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday, November 29, 2002, Thomas Fernandez wrote...
JA>>> I think RitLabs have done the correct thing in following the JA>>> RFCs correctly. The more compliance you have with standards, the JA>>> more likely you are to do well. Start changing things, or JA>>> flexing the rules slightly, and you end up having all kinds of JA>>> problems. >> Actually it tends to be the opposite. If you don't support >> non-compliant stuff you start breaking clients/servers and data >> ends up getting misrepresented/misdisplayed. If software writers, >> especially those who make web browsers didn't support non-compliant >> stuff many pages wouldn't display quite right or not at all > So, let's do away with the RFC's? lol, and end up back where we were before things like the OSI modem, and the TCP/IP model and such... wouldn't the internet be such a fun place if we all had to learn to code our way around problems ;) Moved to TBOT'd as this looks like it could get long ;) - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 6.5.8ckt iQA/AwUBPeecMCuD6BT4/R9zEQIFYQCgkcjsta5Yq8caSV4bRKkvvtRWRxQAoJmc pnPMztBw5sDAKrbiwtBMWsX1 =S8tM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.61 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
