-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, Adam wrote...
>>> Do you think we could sort the Sorting Rules somehow? JA>> If you change the order of the sorting rules, you change the JA>> order in which they are applied. That could have a disastrous JA>> affect in some situations. > If you could sort them, perhaps hierachically, or hiding some > elements, you could have a better overview of the Rule set that you > created, and easier to maintain, and update. That's why you give them creative names ;) > I'm referring to their user "display", not internal rule list. But then how do you set the sorting order? > If your cursor was at a given folder, and you wanted to know the > rule governing it, you might not be too quick to pick it out. Hrm... I can see a partial need for this, but where would you move your mouse over the 'folder'? In the message tree? Could make for a messy display that way. > And of course, you may have other manual acting elements that are > just thrown there in the list disorderly style. Why sort for one set of rules if you're not going to do it for all? Seems rather haphazard that way to me. - -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQA/AwUBPiXA6yuD6BT4/R9zEQIRgACfd7eO3qnEdKpXrXOnkoW/NmotybUAnidg 54/kAQvtBqvd31P24J745lCa =Vw7/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
