Hello Carsten, On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 18:12:56 +0100 GMT (18/01/03, 00:12 +0700 GMT), Carsten Th�nges wrote:
>> And anyway, independently of what you or I may wish, if Ritlabs is >> smart enough and they want to keep in business, they should >> include an HTML editor in a near future version. They _are_ smart. Wait and see... ;-) > NACK. If Ritlabs is smart enough and they want to keep in business, > they should provide full IMAP support for professional business > users or should improve (=debug) the not-so-bad client/server mode. I don't see a contradiction. And the mnemo is NAK. ;-) > Which group is Ritlabs targeting? I am not familiar with their marketing plan, but I believe they are going for both the power-user who won't use HTML in emails (but would need IMAP, better SSL/TLS implementation etc) as well as the sizeable group that moves away from OL/OE but still wants to use HTML in emails. As long as the HTML-editor is optional, the additional "bloat" is justifiable from a marketing point of view. > Yes, but competitors don't sleep ;-) That's why. ;-) -- Cheers, Thomas. Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste. That money talks, I'll not deny. I heard it once. It said, "good-bye." Message reply created with The Bat! 1.63 Beta/3 under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build 2222 A using an AMD Athlon K7 1.2GHz, 128MB RAM ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
