On Friday, January 17, 2003, 8:02:52 PM, Miguel A. Urech ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Someone could perhaps say that e-mail was not "invented" to send > attachments, at least large attachments. FTP was invented for that :) This is fair enough; the encode/decode overhead is a necessary evil. But not everyone is or can be running a server (I can't, no static IP), and I've seen (small) companies that are so concerned with security they won't even run a private FTP server. >> Agent's threading is also superior, IMO. > In the 17 groups I monitor (with TB) I have never seen an un-properly > threaded message. I've never seen TB thread newsgroups, yet :) Perhaps it's not the threading algorithm as such that I prefer in Agent, more how Agent displays and handles threads. In Agent, I nearly always keep messages threaded (sort by date is the ony other option I use), but for some reason I cannot get used to how TB displays threads, moving around the columns and all, so I always end up sorting by received date and, when following a thread like this one, always have to move up :) > As I have said, I read and write news with TB, and I am not the only > one. If you are interested, take a look at: Thanks a lot, I will! .marek jedlinski -- No ads, no nags freeware: http://keynote.prv.pl (KeyNote, PhoneDeck, KookieJar, Oubliette) "Most of what I've learned over the years has come from signatures." (Larry Wall) ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
