Hello Jim Kilgannon,

On or about Sunday, February 09, 2003 at 11:53:24GMT -0500 (which
was 11:53 AM in the tropics where I live) Jim Kilgannon replied:

JK> If it does what I think you are suggesting it might work, but
JK> if I'm sending to a group of addresses where I'm not trying
JK> to hide whom I'm talkng to, like everyone on a board I'm on,
JK> that solution isn't a good one. The people in the BCC would
JK> start to wonder why they were getting BCC's on some issue.

The recipient of a BCC only sees that he/she is the recipient.
They don't know it was sent as a BCC!  At least that is what I
see when I send myself one!  It is proper netiquette to NOT send
a mail out with a list of hundreds of e-mail addresses, as they
can ALL be harvested by a single spammer (infiltrator).  The BCC
recipient's mail has ONLY his address in it!

-- 
Warmest tropical wishes,
Spike

Sign in a London department store: BARGAIN BASEMENT UPSTAIRS

--------------------------------------------------
/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign - Against HTML Mail
\ /   If it aint a webpage it shouldn't be HTML. 
 X    Say NO! to bloatmail - ban HTML mail!
/ \   Ask Spikey, he hates everything (HTML).
--------------------------------------------------
Using TheBat! v1.61 hamstrung by Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
Service Pack 3
--------------------------------------------------


________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to