SH> Now, if I were reading the root and pressed ctrl-shift-m I rightly see
SH> all the messages below it marked as read. However, if I am reading,
SH> say, message (2) and did the same thing, I would /expect/ only message
SH> (2) and its children to be marked as read when, in fact all of root's
SH> messages are so marked.
SH> Am I alone in thinking that this isn't right?
you're not alone. I would prefer it the other way, although I wouldn't
say that the current way of doing it is wrong. If I was the developer,
I would put another short-cut, besides ctrl-shift-M, to mark as read
only the messages below the current one.
If you have the time, please add it to the wishlist page.
--
Ricardo M. Reyes | (Mar del Plata - Argentina)
| Usando The Bat! 1.60c
"Confucius say: Man with an itchy butt have smelly fingers."
________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
