All, It's funny, I started using the Bat for the clean interface. Outlook has too many security problems. Outlook Express has a nice simple interface, but is too uncontrolled and too much a security risk. The Bat gets back to doing email as TEXT, and not trying for the risky html responsiveness of OE. My wife is a non-geek, and finds Bat easier than Eudora.
We've used Eudora, Bat, Outlook, OE, Pegasus, and others. The Bat is what we've still got on our machines - and I don't look for difficult programs, I garantee ya. MB TN> Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 4:15:52 AM, Thomas wrote: >> I am not quite sure what you mean here. My (not very strong) >> ciriticism is that TB's interface appeals *only* to IT professioanls, >> but hey, I like it. It has no bells and whistles, it is designed for >> people who live, think, eat, and breath emails. The interface may be a >> bit of a problem for the amateur user - so I am not quite sure what >> you want to say here. If you say it is "too professional", I know what >> you mean, but "not professional": what profession are you talking >> about? TN> In my opinion TB!'s interface is just as it should be. Clean and TN> logical. I hate the trend of developing skins for every application TN> and I tend not to use applications which are skinable or which put too TN> much emphasis on the looks. Mark <^> _|_ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
