> Hello Mike,

> Friday, June 13, 2003, 11:17:52 AM, you wrote:

>> The practice of publishing my entire message header here, and in the
>> HTML archives is very much insulting and unappreciated.

>> I am trying to help you, and in return, you both insult me and expose
>> me to even more spam?

> It is my understanding that email addresses, even in message
> bodies, are now concealed in the TBUDL web archives. Can anyone
> confirm?

One thing is certain. A simple <meta name="robot" content="none">
won't work any more, and unless there is serious and sophisticated
arrest of those things, the e-mail addresses within the body of
messages could be harvested.

I will await a reply from the management of the HTML archive.

But you know? This is an excellent demonstration of exactly how even
someone with indeed "a modicum of discretion" can be sucked into the
Spam alleyways of this thing called e-mail and once thought to be the
greatest thing since sliced toast for an inbox beating.

E-mail is doing the impossible however--it's managing to kill the
United States Post Office by driving postage prices through the roof
with adjustments every few months, and turning it into a small package
forwarding shop.

Regarding my objection to Kichael's inclusion of my personal e-mail in
the body of his post, he replied "Opps, Sorry. Mistakes happen."

These sorts of mistakes do permanent inbox damage and I am extremely
unhappy at the moment.

--
Regards, Mike

Using The Bat! v1.62q on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 1



________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to