Hello Mike, Friday, June 13, 2003, 11:49:12 AM, you wrote:
> To this author, e-mail is text; HTML belongs on the web; HTML in > e-mail is spam. > Read my lips: Not a thing draconian about that logic. >> Anyway, that's my (limited) experience. > As you say, your experience is "limited." While in general I agree with your sentiments about HTML "email", I do make exceptions for HTML newsletters, untrained family/friends, and the like. In my not-so-limited email experience I would agree that rejecting *all* HTML seems draconian. But if it works for you, so be it. However, I can't agree with the sweeping statement that "HTML in e-mail is spam". As the HTML newsletters I subscribe to are in fact "solicited" and not commercial, they do not fit the standard definition of spam as non-solicited commercial email. Nor are my uninformed/untrained family/friends sending me unsolicited commercial email when they send me HTML emails. However, if we want to play word games, I guess we could refer to anything we feel like as "spam". -- Dave ________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
