Hello,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 6:49:12 PM, you wrote:
MA> <snip>
>> The filtering system you presented, if I remember correctly, rejects
>> all HTML email out of hand. This seems kinda draconian to me. I'll
>> bet a lot of those rejections are false positives. POPFile actually
>> reads the HTML and can correctly distinguish spam-HTML from
>> non-spam-HTML.
MA> To this author, e-mail is text; HTML belongs on the web; HTML in
MA> e-mail is spam.
No, it is not. There's no need to be paranoid about e-mails.
MA> Read my lips: Not a thing draconian about that logic.
Your rules are way too serious in my opinion. But if this is that
blows your hair back. Go with it!
--
Best regards,
____________________________
Csaba Kiss
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+4687286259
fax:+468330498
____________________________
________________________________________________
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html