Joseph N., [JN] wrote: JN> It surprises me a bit that you are using PGP, because I see no type JN> of PGP signature or hash indication in your message, yet TB! shows a JN> signature icon in the upper right corner of the preview pane or JN> message window. And the icon is operable; when I click it, I get a JN> verification of your signature. *Where* is the OpenPGP signature JN> that TB! is verifying??
That's a PGP/MIME signature. I decided to use them on this list even though this signature type isn't supported by the current full release version. Why? This signature type makes the message body text cleaner since there's no signature text present to clutter the message. It's all hidden in the headers. I also know how it's been trying to justify to members why the cluttering is warranted in the case of my signing messages to this list. PGP/MIME is therefore a godsend. Between Marck, Leif, myself and the members who use PGP/MIME supported versions of TB!, i.e., beta versions <g>, we can ensure that my messages are really from me. :) -- -= allie_M =- | List Moderator PGPKeys: http://www.ac-martin.com/pgpkeys.html _
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 1.62r | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
