-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Saturday, September 13, 2003
7:54:38 PM (GMT -05:00)
RE: "Dial-Up, TB and Firewalls"

Greetings Carsten,

On Saturday, September 13, 2003, 3:45:58 PM, you wrote:

>>                                            I now think this was
>> Carsten's point when he mentioned dial-up. I thought he meant the way
>> of connection.

Carsten> No, it wasn't. For me security is binary. Either a system is secure
Carsten> to a given scenario or it is not. It should not matter if one system
Carsten> is more likely to get �attacked� than the other.

As with a house, if you leave the back door open it's only a matter of
time before someone gains entry. It takes no more than an IP block scan
to see who is on-line on any ISP's network and from there a simple port
scan and if one is found to determine if it's open and exploitable.

It makes no difference whether you are on dialup, cable or DSL. The only
thing that matters is how long you are on-line, you have a port open
that can be accessed through and that you are on-line long enough for
the other end to do their deed.

Anyway ...

Takes a matter of seconds to install a dropper on any system. Come
back on-line with the same IP or stay on-line long enough and the
hacker is on your dime, time and system.

- --
Regards,
 DG Raftery Sr.

Drugs have taught an entire generation of American kids the metric system.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 9.0b1
Comment: KeyID: 0xECFE3F95
Comment: Fingerprint: 8ABE 6728 1CB9 E231 B2C8  C29D BC22 D3D1 ECFE 3F95

iQA+AwUBP2Ow87wi09Hs/j+VEQJfXwCY3Dr2tSOSxiTkxxskxJBiM6CqogCgsj9J
T1Bwvn3yyoT1Wn6cSUuidDM=
=xmNg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


________________________________________________
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Reply via email to