Hi Syp, @26-Oct-2003, 20:47 +0100 (19:47 UK time) SyP [S] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to The:
S> Hello The Bat! users and developers, S> I'd like if someone dissected these claims... S> http://lists.netsys.com/pipermail/full-disclosure/2003-October/012716.html Simple. The Bat! - general purpose and inexpensive email client. Not supposed to be secure at the levels being criticised. SecureBat! - more expensive version in which *none* of the reported "bugs" exist. Of course, these are not "bugs". They are deliberate design decisions. Anyone running in so insecure an environment to make this so called "vulnerability" an issue should consider a more expensive solution - like SB or TB Pro. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.01.7 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 '
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
