Hi George, @31-Oct-2003, 18:35 -0800 (01-Nov 02:35 UK time) George Mitchell said:
>> You don't need this degree of separation with TB. Keep them all >> together and segregate by folder and use an account reply >> template that sets reply-to and from addresses according to the >> original recipient of the message: >> %REPLYTO=''%REPLYTO='"P. Johnson" <%OTOADDR>'%- >> %FROM=''%FROM='"P. Johnson" <%OTOADDR>'%- > Isn't that pretty dangerous? Using that template, suppose you > reply to a message that was CC'd to you, or one where your address > wasn't the first one in a list of address in the To field. > Wouldn't you be replying using someone else's address? Oh yes, but this was a response to a *specific* situation when replying to mails known to be sent *to* a specific address. This solution can be fine tuned for any application using advice from the gurus on TBTECH for a regex to make a better decision about what to put. With TBv2 the template macros come alive and are almost a programming language. Which you have already discovered... > I posted a question about my attempt at a workable template for > this a week ago, but got no replies. :-( It's probably too advanced for the UDL forum. I will have another look at it and see if I can offer any helpful hints. -- Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator TB! v2.01.20 on Windows XP 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 '
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
