First, Is TB IMAP known to be buggy? I've done a small amount of
testing and there has been erratic behaviour, TB freezing and confusion.
I want to check my mail at a remote location and achieve the following :
* Messages and my replies to them end up at my primary non-remote machine
* My primary machine knows what messages I replied to or left unread
Is there a way to do this without IMAP? Is TB's data store interaction
efficient enough to work over a network connection? For example, using
POP but pointing two instances of TB to the same data store, which happens
to be remote to one instance (likely via a drive/network mapping).
Is there any other feature of TB which might help me in this regard?
Second, is there any other Bayesian spam plugin for TB? Are any planned?
What about non-Bayesian spam plugins?
I dropped K9 in favor of BayesIt (because I was going to use IMAP), but have
learned I did so prematurely. I like the idea of an integrated plugin, but
BayesIt is not ready for my use (blank dialogs, freezing, bugs).
So, now I am about to go back to POP and K9, I've already deleted the IMAP
test account and removed BayesIt, getting a ton of spam and unable to go
remote and check my mail. I think I may even test IMAP on another client.
-kaishaku
P.S. I've used TB without IMAP and BayesIt for years. My machine is stable.
If you want to say my freezes, etc, are not the fault of IMAP and BayesIt
that is fine, but you are wrong.
________________________________________________
Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
