Hello Thomas Fernandez, on Fri, 28 Nov 2003 08:05:45 +0700 (2003-11-28 02:05:45 in .nl) in the message with reference <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote (at least in part): TF> [FETCH or SEND failed] S>>> on error, change folder name color would be cool.
>> Or change the '@'-sign to the left of the account name into red. TF> Yes, that would be a good idea IMHO. But I fear that means another TF> icon has to be added and that causes problems with the glymphs grid. TF> Or does it? My opinion: what problem? TB! programming / functionality should not be limited by some glyphs grid size. Adjust it, give it some version number, whatever to identify it. Then the TB version using the extended glyphs can test the glyphs-version and either accept or reject it. An older version should not accept anything beyond 'what's defined for it' anyways (called 'good programming', in other words: don't accept anything the program doesn't don't know of), so there should be no problem there. Version numbering / identification for _whatever_: the key to prevent problems. Implementing the available information correctly is the next key (accept / reject). I think a red '@' is less intrusive (just informative) than a whole 'line' being marked. Also, marking a whole line may be confusing now the new folder-color-groups seem to withstand beta tests. Maybe the programmers find some way to accomplish this. >> In this case the '@'-sign is changed into blue also. TF> The colour should be changed back to normal when a successful attempt TF> has been made. Sure, as in 'back to normal' being either 'no new/unread mail' (black) or 'unread mail' (blue), hence the actual state at that moment. -- Kind regards, Peter Ouwehand E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - - Created the above using A program which insists to be : The Bat! V2.01.56 An OS which insists to be : Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.01.3 | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
