Allie Martin wrote: > If I were converting from IMAP to POP, I'd export all my IMAP mail to > UNIX files or copy/move them to local folders. I'd then create fresh > POP accounts, create new folders and then import each exported folders > messages to the corresponding POP folders.
Is there a reason why you would use the Unix file export rather than MSG files or EML? I don't know the difference (except that different mail clients only import/export one or two formats). Are there advantages/disadvantages to any of the three formats? One last thing: could I do a new v2 install, create POP accounts, copy local folders over into the mail directory of the new install, THEN convert two of the accounts to IMAP? Maybe a better question is: Is POP -> IMAP easily done with v2? I know that it's a very different message base and format. You know what? I'm making this WAY more complicated than I need it to be. The two accounts I want to have as IMAP, I don't really need a lot of message archives. The accounts I use for lists (where I would want to move the messages over), I have set as POP anyway. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.02.3 CE | "Using TBUDL" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
